PDA

View Full Version : republicans trying to keep the Dems from owning private biz



Devaclis
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:15 PM
You want some GM stock? You could have it by next year.

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200906041319DOWJONESDJONLINE000857_FORTUNE5.htm

TFOGGuys
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:20 PM
Do I get the option to exchange my shares for a handful of Magic Beans™?

King Nothing
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:22 PM
I'll just take a Chevy Malibu LTZ for my daily driver and a ZR1 for the weekends.

Devaclis
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:24 PM
No, you get a Chevy Van with Moon Windows and shag carpet to haul your family around in. No more toys for the Daddy.

Filo
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:26 PM
I guess I'll take it. I already paid for it, I might as well hold it. I'll swap my share for a clean, 04-06 R6. Anyone?

Devaclis
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:27 PM
I guess I'll take it. I already paid for it, I might as well hold it. I'll swap my share for a clean, 04-06 R6. Anyone?


trade it for toilet paper because in Soviet America, there will be lines for that shit.

Shea
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:29 PM
No, you get a Chevy Van with Moon Windows and shag carpet to haul your family around in.

For some reason that just screams "Doug". :)

DFab
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:35 PM
Stupid dems, they got it backwards. It's private biz that's supposed to own government, not the other way around.

TFOGGuys
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:35 PM
trade it for toilet paper because in Soviet America, there will be lines for that shit.

Maybe they'll just print the stock certificates on soft and absorbent paper, and save resources....

Shea
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:39 PM
Stupid dems, they got it backwards. It's private biz that's supposed to own government, not the other way around.

Well Wall Street owns government, seems to be working out pretty well... :rolleyes:

Snowman
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:53 PM
So let me get this straight… The republican party thinks it can get more voters if it goes communist?

Shea
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 02:55 PM
So let me get this straight… The republican party thinks it can get more voters if it goes communist?

Crazy mixed up world isn't it? Hear Spock is sportin' a goatee too...

Mister BOYD
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 03:01 PM
I love Left wing/ Right wing mud slinging! HAHA!

Devaclis
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 03:19 PM
I love buffalo wings.

Filo
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 03:23 PM
Maybe they'll just print the stock certificates on soft and absorbent paper, and save resources....

Exactly. Every man, woman and child will get 300 stock certificates, in duplicate (2-ply) on a convenient holder roll. The rich will get 3 copies instead of 2, and their certificates will have decorative patters imprinted RIGHT ON THE PAPER!!!. For some unknown reason, each set of certificates will ship with a vial of blue liquid to show how quickly the stock can respond to accidents.

~Barn~
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 03:42 PM
I love buffalo wings.

[/thread]

Wintermute
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 03:55 PM
http://business.theatlantic.com/percentage%20of%20american%20companies%20owned%20b y%20the%20united%20states.png

Percent of companies owned by the gov't: .0507% (http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/now_that_the_government_owns_general_motors.php). Five hundredths of a percent.

We're "socialist" or "communist" in the same way miniature golf is a major competitive sport.

Shea
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 04:09 PM
Percent of companies owned by the gov't: .0507% (http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/06/now_that_the_government_owns_general_motors.php). Five hundredths of a percent.

We're "socialist" or "communist" in the same way miniature golf is a major competitive sport.

Entirely misleading example. To equate GM or AIG to the little mom and pop coffee shop down the street from me is laughable.

And frankly .0507% of the businesses in this country is .0507% too much. Government has neither the authority, vested interest nor knowledge to run any company. But that's just the unhinged libertarian nazi in me I guess...

Wintermute
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 05:38 PM
Misleading how?

As for your pronouncement as to the government's role in all this, well, that's your opinion. The facts on the ground are that our economy has a huge overcapacity problem (both in labor and idle production facilities), and letting the auto industry go under would have made it that much worse.

Shea
Mon Jun 8th, 2009, 07:19 PM
Misleading how?

As I stated. GM is a huge company, your position is that since it only "one" company it is not that big a deal.



As for your pronouncement as to the government's role in all this, well, that's your opinion. The facts on the ground are that our economy has a huge overcapacity problem (both in labor and idle production facilities), and letting the auto industry go under would have made it that much worse.

As it is yours that it is ok, or at least that you've come to accept it. The facts are that the government is taking unprecedented steps into controlling the economy, far beyond any powers granted to it by law or Constitution. Of course if you would like to show me where this power, authority or vested interest (in running a successful company) resides in our founding documents, please show me where my opinion is wrong.

The apologists of big government, such as yourself, tell us that we should all just let them do it for the sake of an unknown calamity that, should it allowed to come to pass (by doing nothing) would doom us all.

The excess capacity that you speak of exists because the market isn't allowed to correct. You are willing to give up your freedom for a little security. As I recall, Mr. Franklin had something to say about that.

Wintermute
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 11:54 AM
I never stated "only 'one' company it is not that big a deal". My point is that people running around tearing their hair out and screaming "socialist" at the top of their lungs are wrong. Five hundredths of a percent isn't Socialism, and it sure as hell isn't Communism.

As for the "resides in our founding documents" point, lots of things we do as a country aren't in the "founding documents". We're an advanced industrial country of 300,000,000 people, not 13 agricultural-based 18th century colonies. Trying to manage a modern industrial country with only the tools afforded 250 years ago is misguided and wrong. You can't turn back the clock, especially since our global competitors are definitely not going to.

MetaLord 9
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:08 PM
So let me get this straight… The republican party thinks it can get more voters if it goes communist?
They're going off of the "We Called Obama a Socialist & It Got Him Elected" plan to retake the...well anything I suppose.

Snowman
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:26 PM
They're going off of the "We Called Obama a Socialist & It Got Him Elected" plan to retake the...well anything I suppose.So you’re saying every politician is the closet communist…

MetaLord 9
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:32 PM
So you’re saying every politician is the closet communist…
There's always Nader! :D

Snowman
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:33 PM
There's always Nader! :DOk so ether a closet communist or a certified nut job.

MetaLord 9
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:37 PM
Ok so ether a closet communist or a certified nut job.
Speaking of which, do you know exactly to whom I should apply for that certification? Is there a board or exam of some sort, or do I need to publish a paper?

Pandora-11
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:41 PM
Until we find a "statesman/woman"....someone who holds interest in the betterment of our country sacred, believes in the founding fathers' vision, doesn't kowtow to polls and media, isn't looking for power for power's sake or greed for greed's sake, then we're in trouble. I want to be positive, but my gosh, I'm infuriated everyday watching the stuff going on.:banghead:

Snowman
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:43 PM
Speaking of which, do you know exactly to whom I should apply for that certification? Is there a board or exam of some sort, or do I need to publish a paper?I think you have to subscribe to a newsletter. Ask Shea…

TFOGGuys
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 12:47 PM
Until we find a "statesman/woman"....someone who holds interest in the betterment of our country sacred, believes in the founding fathers' vision, doesn't kowtow to polls and media, isn't looking for power for power's sake or greed for greed's sake, then we're in trouble. I want to be positive, but my gosh, I'm infuriated everyday watching the stuff going on.:banghead:

How about we fertilize that garden with unicorn manure?

Shea
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 02:20 PM
I think you have to subscribe to a newsletter. Ask Shea…

Being a nut-job is self-certifying. Closet communist however does require a board review by several high ranking members of the "we know better how to run your life then you do" crowd.

rforsythe
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 04:09 PM
How about we fertilize that garden with unicorn manure?

Because the Unicorn Manure industry is likely funded with taxpayer money, so it would only feed the problem so to speak. Plus now that less qualified but cheaper Unicorns are taking the jobs in India, our own mythical crap industry is likely to take a serious nosedive. I am afraid that without major innovations, the amount of mythical crap our country produces will continue to decline.

Shea
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 04:12 PM
:pointlaugh: That is some funny shit right there...mythical or not.

Pandora-11
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 04:24 PM
Because you cynics asked for it:

http://tetragrammatron.com/unicornturds.html

....your own personal unicorn turds/manure....and cheap too!!!:)

..."for something you can believe in."

Mister BOYD
Tue Jun 9th, 2009, 04:29 PM
Wow.. the ad is right! A fun size bag for $3.00 is WAY too hot for EBAY!