PDA

View Full Version : pit bull owners more likely to be criminals



whitebrad
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 03:41 AM
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/pit-bull-owners-more-likely-to-be-criminals/2006/11/17/1163266755120.html"Owners of vicious dogs who have been cited for failing to register a dog (or) failing to keep a dog confined on the premises ... are more than nine times more likely to have been convicted for a crime involving children, three times more likely to have been convicted of domestic violence ... and nearly eight times more likely to be charged with drug (crimes) than owners of low-risk licensed dogs" (study abstract link below)

http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/21/12/1616.abstract

DevilsTonic
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 07:14 AM
articles like that piss me off.

dirkterrell
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 07:30 AM
Difficult to assess their study when the full paper isn't freely available. Being a four year old paper, it should be. That said, I wouldn't say I'm too surprised at the results. I mean, you don't see gang bangers running around with purse chihuahuas. :-) Of course, the extension that poor thinkers and those with an agenda will make, that someone who owns a pit bull is a criminal, is nonsense.

Dirk

Valguard
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 07:35 AM
All rapist look at porn.
Looking at porn means your a rapist? Not true.

All criminals own pit bulls.
Pit bull owners are all criminals? No.

dirkterrell
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 07:42 AM
Here is a later study that looked at the same situation:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13073172/Vicious-Dogs-The-Antisocial-Behaviors-and-Psychological-Characteristics-of-Owners

In this study, owners of small dogs were just as likely to commit drug crimes as those who owned "vicious" dogs. The 2006 study claims that the ratio is eight to one (assuming that the cited newspaper article is correct and that is often a big assumption). The study above involved undergraduates at "a large eastern university." I think the disparity in the rates might just have something to do with the sample pool. Since I don't have the 2006 article, it is not possible to say with certainty.

Dirk

Wrider
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 09:27 AM
Yeah I think it's actually more of the opposite.
"Criminals more likely to own pit bulls" merely because of the dogs' "badass" reputation.

dallas
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 09:48 AM
People who own Puggles cook meth and commit violent crimes on the handicapped.

Ricky
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 09:56 AM
Dogs are like guns to criminals. The more badass the gun, the cooler they are. Therefore, the more badass and aggressive your dog, the cooler you are.

And unfortunately, those are the people that give pits, and guns, a bad name.

Snowman
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 10:02 AM
Here is a later study that looked at the same situation:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13073172/Vicious-Dogs-The-Antisocial-Behaviors-and-Psychological-Characteristics-of-Owners

In this study, owners of small dogs were just as likely to commit drug crimes as those who owned "vicious" dogs. The 2006 study claims that the ratio is eight to one (assuming that the cited newspaper article is correct and that is often a big assumption). The study above involved undergraduates at "a large eastern university." I think the disparity in the rates might just have something to do with the sample pool. Since I don't have the 2006 article, it is not possible to say with certainty.

DirkAnd what government agency is funding this most important research? Is homeland security trying to profile people by their dogs now?

dirkterrell
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 10:20 AM
And what government agency is funding this most important research? Is homeland security trying to profile people by their dogs now?

They didn't acknowledge any funding in the paper. That is usually done when Federal funding is involved. Without further info, I'd say it was curious psychologists at WVU doing independent research.

Filo
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 10:37 AM
People who own Poodles are more likely to commit crimes of fashion.

But back to the big, aggressive dogs - what is it with the cool, gang banging types getting the big, aggressive male dogs and celebrating the size of their testicles? That has always seemed very strange to me. That and truck nuts. Those gentlemen should just admit they love testicles publicly and stop putting them on display for the rest of us.

Ricky
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 10:41 AM
^^:lol:^^

The Dude Abides!
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 10:51 AM
If a badass dog makes you a badass.......what does this make me?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7Q_bT34Qh4

salsashark
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 11:11 AM
...That and truck nuts. Those gentlemen should just admit they love testicles publicly and stop putting them on display for the rest of us.

There was actually quite a bit of truck-nut drama on base a couple of years ago. Apparently there was a feud between nut loving truck owners and non-nut lovers. It made for some interesting directives being passed down by base leadership. :lol:

Filo
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 11:14 AM
There was actually quite a bit of truck-nut drama on base a couple of years ago. Apparently there was a feud between nut loving truck owners and non-nut lovers. It made for some interesting directives being passed down by base leadership. :lol:

Why do we get truck nuts, but we don't get VW Beetle vags? I would follow that person around town all week...

dirkterrell
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 12:14 PM
There was actually quite a bit of truck-nut drama on base a couple of years ago. Apparently there was a feud between nut loving truck owners and non-nut lovers. It made for some interesting directives being passed down by base leadership. :lol:

Reminds me of this current exercise in bickering:

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/936951--what-s-in-a-name-city-officials-not-keen-on-harry-baals

Dirk

wulf
Fri Feb 11th, 2011, 09:13 PM
"Owners of... dogs who have been cited ... ... and nearly eight times more likely to be charged with... (crimes) than owners of licensed dogs"

So what your saying is people who break the law are more likely to be criminals than those that don't break the law? How insightful.

whitebrad
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 06:54 AM
So what your saying is people who break the law are more likely to be criminals than those that don't break the law? How insightful.

i am not saying anything, actually...

i only posted, and quoted, the article and the abstract to the study.

my opinion on this subject is biased... i love pits. i don't think anything i say would matter at all, but since i can't see the study, all i have to go on is the methedology used for the study. and since that method is a matched study, instead of a readily available case study, i find some fault, as matched studies and rdd studies have some inherent flaws...

but the article was quite inflammatory... i think all of US on here that own dogs would make their results skewed as hell, considering they are counting convictions and INCLUDING traffic convictions...

is there a person on this whole board who doesn't have a ticket?

modette99
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 09:20 AM
..

The Black Knight
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 09:25 AM
is there a person on this whole board who doesn't have a ticket?

:hibye:

thankgod
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 10:10 AM
:shock:
People who own Puggles cook meth and commit violent crimes on the handicapped.

Wrider
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 11:54 AM
:hibye:
Your current ride doesn't go fast enough to get a ticket, so you don't count... :drink:

The Black Knight
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 12:33 PM
Your current ride doesn't go fast enough to get a ticket, so you don't count... :drink:
HAHA!! I beg to differ, but will say this. The whole 8 years of riding sportbikes, I never once had a ticket for speeding. And believe me, I did my part in not obeying the speed limit, I would just pick and choose my locations wisely to turn it up. Most of the time, it was in the mountains with no one around.

Wrider
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 12:42 PM
HAHA!! I beg to differ, but will say this. The whole 8 years of riding sportbikes, I never once had a ticket for speeding. And believe me, I did my part in not obeying the speed limit, I would just pick and choose my locations wisely to turn it up. Most of the time, it was in the mountains with no one around.

Gotta say that's pretty impressive!

The Black Knight
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 12:59 PM
Gotta say that's pretty impressive!
Well I had my license to think about, as I need it for my line of work. Now that I've got a CDL, it just compounds the issue. Any little thing, stays on my record for a long time, so the switch to the Harley was the way to go. Plus I'm getting old HAHA!!, was getting burnt out with sportbikes. Needed comfort over performance. Don't get me wrong, the most fun I've ever had on a motorcycle was doing trackdays. But on the streets, I've got to say, my cruiser is some of the most fun I've had in a long time. Had I'd known cruisers were this enjoyable, I would have switched a long time ago, or at least had the two(sportbike & cruiser). But now, I'm all about comfort, I still wave to the sportbike guys as I get passed or see them going the other way. I look at it, as I still get to where I'm going and at least I can stand up straight when I do. :)

Filo
Sat Feb 12th, 2011, 02:16 PM
Plus I'm getting old HAHA!!, was getting burnt out with sportbikes. Needed comfort over performance. Don't get me wrong, the most fun I've ever had on a motorcycle was doing trackdays. But on the streets, I've got to say, my cruiser is some of the most fun I've had in a long time.

Now you just need some truck nuts for that Harley and you are all set.

Also, in one of the very few things that BK and I have in common - no tickets on a motorcycle ever. The last ticket I got was 1989 for an expired registration. Never, ever had a speeding ticket. Ever.