PDA

View Full Version : ZX-14 or HYABUSA



DICK
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:12 PM
So I'm thinking about the ZX-14 or the hyabusa. I would like some input/thoughts on both of these bikes ??

Zach929rr
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:23 PM
I heard scooters are pretty cool.

Slo
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:24 PM
What would you like to know about them and what are you expecting from these bikes?

Ghosty
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:45 PM
New 2012's? If you watch Speed Channel much, you've probably seen the Kawi commercial bashing the Busa as "falling short on all categories". I doubt that the variances can be too glaring, on two bikes that are both so technologically advanced and have frieght-train horsepower. Do your own research for sure, since there aren't that many realworld people with new ones to ask.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNlVFNiV1ds

If you dig through the noise, there are a couple useful posts in these threads:

http://www.hayabusa.org/forum/general-bike-related-topics/158137-official-2012-kawasaki-head-head-comparison-video-zx-14-vs-hayabusa.html

http://zx-10r.net/forum/showthread.php?t=109352

http://www.bikeland.org/board/viewthread.php?FID=13&TID=64072&pagenumber=2

madvlad
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:48 PM
Like Slo said, what are you looking from a bike?... Also riding experience is a huge plus mainly wuth these two as they put down serious power from the factory.

Sarge
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:49 PM
According to most magazines and such I've been reading, the '12 ZX-14R is the way to go. More HP, more torque, etc etc etc. I've seen a few videos of the two raced in the 1/4 mile and have never once seen the Busa win.

At the same time though, the BMW S1000RR has comparable horsepower (depending on the dyno, etc, but often 2-5 more HP than either the '12 Busa or ZX-14R), but 15-20# less torque. However, fully stock the S1000RR weighs a good 100-150# less than either the Busa or the 14R, and will typically beat either bike in the 1/4, stock. Problem is, the 14R and Busa handle things such as turbos and NOS much better than the BMW, if drag racing and top speed is your thing.

Ezzzzy1
Sun May 6th, 2012, 07:51 PM
Definitely go with the Busa if you want everyone to think you are cool :lol:

jamieness08busa
Sun May 6th, 2012, 08:14 PM
Definately made me cool. 1" bar risers and you have all day comfort, all the power you need and decent in the twisties.

ATL
Sun May 6th, 2012, 09:11 PM
S1000RR gets my vote.
-Chris

Hibs
Sun May 6th, 2012, 09:35 PM
ZX14R hands down. there is nothing that even comes close in power (sorry, a BMW S1000RR stock is like 10-15HP less), and the bike is suppppper smooth, very agile, very comfortable, etc. Go test ride one, you'll buy it on the spot.

Sarge
Sun May 6th, 2012, 09:56 PM
ZX14R hands down. there is nothing that even comes close in power (sorry, a BMW S1000RR stock is like 10-15HP less), and the bike is suppppper smooth, very agile, very comfortable, etc. Go test ride one, you'll buy it on the spot.

Motorcyclist Magazine put them without 2-3 HP, BMW favored. I just looked something a minute ago that put the 14R ahead by 3 HP. Nobody disputes the huge weight difference though, well over 100 lbs, which makes a huge difference, especially stock vs stock (no NOS, turbos, etc). The 14R does have a 10-15 ft lb torque gain though, stock vs stock, which makes since when you compare the ~1450 cc 14R motor versus the 999 cc BMW motor.

TransNone13
Sun May 6th, 2012, 09:58 PM
My understanding is that the '12 model has beaten the Busa in just about every category, even if just slightly. I believe I read the reviews in Cycle World and Sports Rider.

NUTZ
Sun May 6th, 2012, 10:40 PM
Keep in mind the 2012 ZX14 has the bigger engine, more than a 100cc at that... I'm sure this will be reflected in insurance premiums. As for the busa, it's a solid bike with 13 years of history. Suzuki really didn't change much mechanically from the first gen to the second gen busa.

sag
Sun May 6th, 2012, 10:44 PM
the newest sport rider has a comparo. they give it to the zx14. more power, better braking feel, and more laxed ergos too. but the hayabusa is still a hayabusa man, cant go wrong with either for what they are. when youre about to throw down the cash, test ride both and your mid will be made up.

Wrider
Mon May 7th, 2012, 12:44 AM
ZX-14 is winning all the comparisons, and if you can't spell it, I'd definitely stay off of the Hayabusa.

big53lee
Mon May 7th, 2012, 12:49 AM
Being 310lbs I love both of those bikes! I agree you should test drive em both.

Just make sure the first thing u should do is get rid of those semi truck sized smoke stacks on the sides of the bike. My god those cans are hideous!

big53lee
Mon May 7th, 2012, 12:52 AM
And if u get the busa, talk to slo. I hear he had the badest busa in town.

Hibs
Mon May 7th, 2012, 10:37 AM
Motorcyclist Magazine put them without 2-3 HP, BMW favored. I just looked something a minute ago that put the 14R ahead by 3 HP. Nobody disputes the huge weight difference though, well over 100 lbs, which makes a huge difference, especially stock vs stock (no NOS, turbos, etc). The 14R does have a 10-15 ft lb torque gain though, stock vs stock, which makes since when you compare the ~1450 cc 14R motor versus the 999 cc BMW motor.

Don't know about the article you are referring to, but I was unaware the new BMW was dynoing over 190rwhp STOCK, and 200rwhp with just an oil change....

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/articlefiles/V1_Slugger_Stock_After_Break_In_Zoom.jpg

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/articlefiles/V1_Slugger_Stock_Alisyn_Petron_Test_Zoom.jpg


OR how about 200+ in the standing mile with just BOLT ONs!!

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/templates/bpp1.aspx?articleid=316&zoneid=10

Slo
Mon May 7th, 2012, 10:57 AM
and if you can't spell it, I'd definitely stay off of the Hayabusa.
LOL


And if u get the busa, talk to slo. I hear he had the badest busa in town.

Just pretty in some opinions, but definitely not the badest haha. However it was still fun lowered and 9" stretch up in the canyons.

These big bikes may not be the best for a roadcourse, however you will have no issues keeping up just fine with spirited rides.

CYCLE_MONKEY
Mon May 7th, 2012, 12:23 PM
Even though I'm a suzuki guy, I'd have to recommend the ZX-14 if that's the kind of bike you want. Not for me though, I'll trade a little HP for a LOT less weight.

Nikdiculous
Mon May 7th, 2012, 01:34 PM
The deciding factors in my choice of a '08 ZX-14 over an '09 'Busa were the ergos and the Special Edition paint job. The reach to the handlebars was a little shorter on the Ninja and the footpegs were considerably lower as well, resulting in a more more comfortable riding position for me. Back then, the 'Busa had few more ponies, and was a couple tenths of a second faster to 60 or 100, but seriously, the performance differences were minimal. Both bikes have more than enough torque to keep up with your GSR/CBR/R1 buddies, even when you've got a fat chick on the back...

Ghosty
Mon May 7th, 2012, 02:43 PM
Problem is, the 14R and Busa handle things such as turbos and NOS much better than the BMW, if drag racing and top speed is your thing.
Why is that? Different (lower) compression? Stronger internal components? Or just that they're getting similar horsepower but from larger displacement, so less stressful on internals?

Sarge
Mon May 7th, 2012, 03:02 PM
Don't know about the article you are referring to, but I was unaware the new BMW was dynoing over 190rwhp STOCK, and 200rwhp with just an oil change....

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/articlefiles/V1_Slugger_Stock_After_Break_In_Zoom.jpg

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/articlefiles/V1_Slugger_Stock_Alisyn_Petron_Test_Zoom.jpg


OR how about 200+ in the standing mile with just BOLT ONs!!

http://www.brocksperformance.com/brocknm/templates/bpp1.aspx?articleid=316&zoneid=10

All the RWHP figures I've seen for the BMW were closer to 186, with 82-85 ft lb torque typically. I think it was Sport Rider the other day which stated barel over 100-102 ft lb torque on the 14R, which is waaay off of the links you posted. 120 ft lbs torque is insane! I'm not disputing any of this, the 14R definitely has more power, but I'm seeing very different numbers for both bikes all over the place. I'll try and check some things out when I get home later to see if I can narrow down the figures I was finding previously. I also have that magazine at home. I'm not saying I'm right and you're wrong, just participating in the discussion. Like I said, the 14R is definately one mean bike, but like CM said, I'd take a few fewer HP for the massive weight savings and the better cornering, but I've got a friend who's the exact opposite, and I understand his preference and don't fault him for it. He loves to drag, I love to lean, and the BMW is damn near the best of both worlds, stock at least.

Sarge
Mon May 7th, 2012, 03:04 PM
Why is that? Different (lower) compression? Stronger internal components? Or just that they're getting similar horsepower but from larger displacement, so less stressful on internals?

I think it's the latter, bigger motors make certain mods easier, as do the bigger frames, since it's already heavier and there's more room to bolt things on to. Bigger cylinder likely means you can inject more NOS per piston cycle, turbos can force in more air, etc as well.

kawasakirob
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:21 PM
THe BMW is in a different catagory than the other bikes you are comparing. Those bikes are so close (the 14R and Busa) its really not going to matter. Both have stupid horspower and touring comfort with sufficient handling. So If I was looking for an all around sportbike to get, it would be the 14R...strictly for bragging rights and that it would do everything very well.! Some other good deals out their are ZX12's and 1st. gen Busa's that you can find for 5500 or less in great shape with low miles, even 1st gen 14's are becoming cheap

kawasakirob
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:26 PM
As for 14's not being able to handle...? This is on the dragon
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/118_15394000653_667760653_1130958_4730_n.jpg

CYCLE_MONKEY
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:34 PM
Why is that? Different (lower) compression? Stronger internal components? Or just that they're getting similar horsepower but from larger displacement, so less stressful on internals?
Generally, the Gixxers and ZX's etc have lighter components, less room to grow in displacement, and castings, rods, etc., with weight taken out of them. On a Busa or 14, where weight is far less of a concern, they beef things up. Plus, these bikes are drag-raced a lot more, so they're made to handle that. Like the old ('81-86) GS series Suzukis were drag raced a LOT more than the '86 and later Gixxers. Strength == weight.

CYCLE_MONKEY
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:35 PM
As for 14's not being able to handle...? This is on the dragon
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/118_15394000653_667760653_1130958_4730_n.jpg
The fat chick can dance........but it's still a fat chick! :)

kawasakirob
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:38 PM
The fat chick can dance........but it's still a fat chick! :)

That fat chicks got big ummmmm. yeah :eyebrows:

Ghosty
Mon May 7th, 2012, 05:47 PM
Generally, the Gixxers and ZX's etc have lighter components, less room to grow in displacement, and castings, rods, etc., with weight taken out of them. On a Busa or 14, where weight is far less of a concern, they beef things up. Plus, these bikes are drag-raced a lot more, so they're made to handle that. Like the old ('81-86) GS series Suzukis were drag raced a LOT more than the '86 and later Gixxers. Strength == weight.
Cool, thx Sarge & CM. I'm accumulating data in case someday I wanna take my future R1 beyond bolt-ons. Turbo/SC, or just exhaust/headwork/cams/tune/fuel/NO2.

Sean
Mon May 7th, 2012, 06:23 PM
I think you guys got trolled...

Wrider
Mon May 7th, 2012, 06:35 PM
The liter bikes can handle turbo/SC, but you're not gonna want to push much boost without some serious internal work (conrods, pistons, etc). I don't have much experience with forced induction bikes, but I'd stay under 7 PSI on a stock internal literbike. By contrast, Servion's stock internal Busa (as in not even upgraded valve springs) is pushing 10 PSI reliably.

performula
Mon May 7th, 2012, 09:42 PM
I'm a Suzi guy at heart, but the Busa is a dime a dozen. My comment is bunk as I'm not up to date on the "hyper" "sport touring" or whatever they call them. Go w/ the best deal honestly.

brennahm
Mon May 7th, 2012, 10:24 PM
You guys got trolled...

Fixed.

Fernman
Tue May 8th, 2012, 09:53 PM
For the price I would get the Busa, if price is not an issue I would get the BMW. the new ZX14 is a sweet bike too when you compare them its like Ford vs. Chevy.

hardhitr
Tue Jul 3rd, 2012, 07:58 PM
i test rode both before i bought my 09 ZX14. i was stepping up from an 05 CBR1000RR, so both hyperbikes scared the crap out of me. the 09 special edition paint and the SMOOTHNESS of the ZX won out. yes its more comfortable, but most buy for brand loyalty or power. comfort and braking and other features are kinda mute on this issue. if you can test ride both, do, and i'll bet you pick the ZX. cant say one is faster than the other, unless youre talking about the 2012 ZX. on these bikes, its whoever hits the lower gear and WOTs first. looking for some hyperbike riders in aurora. someone hit me up, dont care if youre zuki or saki. lets ride.

Ghosty
Tue Jul 3rd, 2012, 08:14 PM
So I'm thinking about the ZX-14 or the hyabusa. I would like some input/thoughts on both of these bikes ??
Old thread, but just curious, what did you end up buying?