The very recent Islamic (anti-Jewish) terrorist attacks in France brings up one of our hot political topics of the last decade especially since the Patriot Act. Not starting an argument in either direction, but feel free to discuss why you think the French police handled this well, or didn't move in soon enough?...
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/23/world/...html?hpt=hp_t3
My personal thoughts are, if what the PM is saying above jives, then I side with the government on this. The results are unfortunate, but Liberty and citizen's rights (which he is, a French citizen) were respected. Big question is, how our American FBI/DHS would've handled this, if any different? He is on our "no-fly" list, but that still isn't enough to warrant arrest. Makes for interesting debate...French police had no grounds on which to arrest gunman Mohammed Merah before he carried out three attacks in which seven people died, Prime Minister Francois Fillon told French radio station RTL Friday.
Fillon acknowledged that some questions should be asked, particularly with regard to surveillance.
But, he said, "there was no single element" that would have allowed the police to arrest Merah before the killings began.
"We don't have the right in a country like ours to keep under permanent surveillance without a judicial decision someone who has committed no offense," he told RTL. "We live in a country under the rule of law."