Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 25 to 38 of 38

Thread: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

  1. #25
    Say what again... Site Admin rforsythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    On the brink
    Posts
    8,013

    Re: CSC Server Performance

    I'll see if there are weird DNS settings in play that might be affecting the prefetch on my end. I can't imagine why there would be, but you never know.

    Attachments are still broken. I've had a few more pressing things to deal with.
    Asshole Nazi devil moderator out to get each and every one of you

    Nothing in all the world is more dangerous
    than sincere ignorance
    and conscientious stupidity.
    - Martin Luther King, Jr.


    disce quasi semper victurus vive quasi cras moriturus

    The return of MRA #321! Sponsored by Western Ambulance, Chicane Trackdays, and a very patient wife...

  2. #26
    Senior Member cptschlongenheimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cone of Silence
    Posts
    744

    Re: CSC Server Performance

    No worries. Not pressuring ya, Ralph. Just trying to give ya helpful info.
    89 EX500 RIP
    06 R6S RIP
    03 R6

  3. #27
    Junior Member Yearly Supporter 0N1X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    28

    Re: CSC Server Performance

    Quote Originally Posted by rforsythe View Post
    Attachments are still broken. I've had a few more pressing things to deal with.
    For me, performance is top notch, but sometimes (or more than sometimes) I can't view attachment images. Both IE and Firefox.
    2012 Monster 1100EVO
    "I ride a naked Italian..."


  4. #28
    Senior Member DevilsTonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    3,009

    Re: CSC Server Performance

    Modifying the prefetch settings in Chrome (OSX) seems to have remedied the issues I was seeing.

    Leah
    05 Raven R1
    01 YZ250F

  5. #29
    Senior Member vort3xr6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    2,211

    Re: CSC Server Performance

    Working fantastic on Netscape Navigator over here.

  6. #30
    Princess of Prius Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    West
    Posts
    6,926

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    Thanks for the Chrome update, that works much better for me now.

  7. #31
    Gold Member bulldog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    8,611

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    I think the problem here is all the porn DevilsTonic downloads; virus!
    Bulldog's Motto: F*ck around and I'm going to bite you!!!

  8. #32
    Gold Member bulldog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    8,611

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    And solution to Chrome issue can be found here
    http://www.cosportbikeclub.org/forum...ad.php?t=42019
    Bulldog's Motto: F*ck around and I'm going to bite you!!!

  9. #33
    Huge Member Site Admin Mother Goose's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    a glass case of emotion
    Posts
    272,202

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    I have issues w/ Firefox sometimes. It just sits there and thinks about opening the page. I'll right click the thread and open in a new tab and it opens right up. Weird.

  10. #34
    Board Newbie nextraztus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    7

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    For the record, this option disables the phantom domain name lookups that Chrome does in the background. Basically, what happens under the hood if you dig around is that you get a bunch of requests something like this:

    Code:
    ------------------------------------------
    CONNECT_JOB (id=71154)  [start=Thu Aug 25 2011 17:55:46 GMT-0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)]
    ------------------------------------------
    t=1314316546660 [st=0] +SOCKET_POOL_CONNECT_JOB             [dt=4]
    t=1314316546660 [st=0]    +SOCKET_POOL_CONNECT_JOB_CONNECT  [dt=4]
                               --> group_name = "cpngackimfmofbokmjmljamhdncknpmg:65535"
    t=1314316546660 [st=0]        HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL            [dt=4]
                                  --> source_dependency = {"id":71155,"type":7}
    t=1314316546664 [st=4]    -SOCKET_POOL_CONNECT_JOB_CONNECT  
                               --> net_error = -105 (NAME_NOT_RESOLVED)
    t=1314316546664 [st=4] -SOCKET_POOL_CONNECT_JOB             
    
    ------------------------------------------
    HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_REQUEST (id=71155)  [start=Thu Aug 25 2011 17:55:46 GMT-0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)]
    ------------------------------------------
    t=1314316546660 [st=0] +HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_REQUEST        [dt=4]
                            --> address_family = 0          
                            --> allow_cached_response = true
                            --> host = "cpngackimfmofbokmjmljamhdncknpmg:65535"
                            --> is_speculative = false      
                            --> only_use_cached_response = false
                            --> priority = 0                
                            --> source_dependency = {"id":71154,"type":4}
    t=1314316546660 [st=0]     HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_CREATE_JOB  
    t=1314316546660 [st=0]     HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_JOB_ATTACH  [dt=4]
                               --> source_dependency = {"id":71156,"type":8}
    t=1314316546664 [st=4] -HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_REQUEST        
                            --> net_error = -105 (NAME_NOT_RESOLVED)
                            --> os_error = 11004            
                            --> os_error_string = "The requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found.\r\n"
    
    ------------------------------------------
    HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_JOB (id=71156)  [start=Thu Aug 25 2011 17:55:46 GMT-0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)]
    ------------------------------------------
    t=1314316546660 [st=0] +HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_JOB  [dt=4]
                            --> host = "cpngackimfmofbokmjmljamhdncknpmg"
                            --> source_dependency = {"id":71155,"type":7}
    t=1314316546660 [st=0]     HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_ATTEMPT_STARTED  
                               --> attempt_number = 1
    t=1314316546661 [st=1]     HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_ATTEMPT_FINISHED  
                               --> attempt_number = 1
                               --> net_error = -105 (NAME_NOT_RESOLVED)
                               --> os_error = 11004
                               --> os_error_string = "The requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found.\r\n"
    t=1314316546664 [st=4] -HOST_RESOLVER_IMPL_JOB  
                            --> net_error = -105 (NAME_NOT_RESOLVED)
                            --> os_error = 11004  
                            --> os_error_string = "The requested name is valid, but no data of the requested type was found.\r\n"
    It's not that Google is acting like the collective here, it's that most ISP's try to be 'helpful' and watch your DNS queries. When you go to a site that doesn't exist (usually a typo) they have "partnered" with some search company that they then happily forward your request to as a query. This company then turns your misspelling into a nice ad-filled landing page with your ISP's logo on it.

    When Chrome does these requests first, it's EXPECTING garbage/failures to come back. If it gets a "real" IP address it knows that your ISP's DNS cannot be trusted. I'm not sure what it does at that point, I haven't reviewed that chunk of source code. Usually this happens very very quickly. According to my tools the CSC DNS server handles a lookup in about 50ms on average, my ISP usually handles it in about the same. The internal resolver on your computer is practically instantaneous. Granted, there is a lot of caching and things that go on in this process, but it's still very fast for non-authoritive lookups.

    I'm still determining if I'm having page load issues after changing this setting. I'm going to keep hunting for the root cause of this because no other site I frequent has this problem (and that's a LOT of sites and I use Chrome almost exclusively at work/home/play/etc). This could be some obscure bug that needs to be reported to the Chromium team.
    Last edited by nextraztus; Thu Aug 25th, 2011 at 06:21 PM. Reason: additional info.
    -Nex

  11. #35
    Board Newbie nextraztus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    7

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    http://code.google.com/p/chromium/is...etail?id=95461

    I've given up. Passing it along to the Chromium Devs.
    -Nex

  12. #36
    I'm pumped... Let's let the healing begin! Lifetime Supporter ~Barn~'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lone Tree
    Posts
    17,656

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    Nice work, Nex.
    ~Brandon~
    Aprilia RSV 1000 R Factory - "Gemma"
    MV Agusta F3 800 - "Amy Lou"
    Rattan Fat Bear Plus - "Lynda"
    (720) 935-6438
    I rarely think of motorcycles without a little yearning. They are about moving, and humans, I think, yearn to move – it’s in our cells, in our desires. We quiet our babies with cyclic movement, and we quiet ourselves by going.
    Melissa Holbrook Pierson

  13. #37
    Say what again... Site Admin rforsythe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    On the brink
    Posts
    8,013

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    Nex please do let me know what you find out. DNS has not yet been moved, so the only thing that changed was the A record when the web server was relocated. I see both my pri/sec DNS servers are consistent, so I'm really not sure what is causing this either.

    For you non-Chrome users, does the site seem a little faster today? I did some optimization over the weekend.
    Asshole Nazi devil moderator out to get each and every one of you

    Nothing in all the world is more dangerous
    than sincere ignorance
    and conscientious stupidity.
    - Martin Luther King, Jr.


    disce quasi semper victurus vive quasi cras moriturus

    The return of MRA #321! Sponsored by Western Ambulance, Chicane Trackdays, and a very patient wife...

  14. #38
    Member zPurpleRoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Rock....Castle Rock
    Posts
    226

    Re: CSC Server Performance *** UPDATE: Problem Linked to Google Chrome

    Yes....the site is faster. Thank you. I was just thinking to myself that the site was faster when I read your post....lol. Great job!
    aka Zane aka The Quiet One
    Silver & Black 2000 RSV Mille (Giada)
    ITALIAN RED 2002 VFR800 (Natasha) - sold

    *** NO MATTER WHAT PEOPLE SAY, THERE IS SEX IN "THE PURPLE ROOM" ***

Similar Threads

  1. Google Chrome Issues?
    By Keyser Soze in forum Site Comments
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Tue Jan 20th, 2009, 02:57 PM
  2. [NWS] Fatal flaw discovered in Google Chrome
    By Aracheon in forum Jokes & Stuff
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Tue Sep 9th, 2008, 09:38 AM
  3. Update on bike problem
    By haywood jablome in forum Bike Tech
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Wed Jan 1st, 2003, 01:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •